Here is a great story out of Vancouver of a group of strangers using twitter to come together and help the homeless.
Another example of how social media can build new friends and community and help make the world a better place – sadly we all know it won’t have any impact of the powerful narrative of youth as uncaring, self-centred narcsistic and apathetic.
And then there are those who think these tools are really just the hands of the devil. I didn’t know anyone still read Andrew Keen but the other day a reader pointed to his (1000th) column on how the internet will end society as we know it. Check out this excerpt:
The 1930s fascists were expert at using all the most technologically sophisticated communications technologies—the cinema, radio, newspapers, advertising—to spew their destructive, hate-filled message. What they excelled at was removing the the traditional middlemen like religion, media, and politics, and using these modern technologies of mass communications to speak with reassuring familiarity to the disorientated masses.
Imagine if today’s radically unregulated Internet, with its absence of fact checkers and editorial gatekeepers, had existed back then. Imagine that universal broadband had been available to enable the unemployed to read the latest conspiracy theories about the Great Crash on the blogosphere. Imagine the FDR-baiting, Hitler-loving Father Charles Coughlin, equipped with his “personalized” YouTube channel, able, at a click of a button, to distribute his racist message to the suffering masses. Or imagine a marketing genius like the Nazi chief propagandist Josef Goebbels managing a viral social network of anti-Semites which could coordinate local meet-ups to assault Jews and Communists.
You can almost feel the anger and rage ooze off the screen – try reading the whole thing. I can see why Keen is scared – he probably has visions of people like him running around the internet. That said, he’s ultimately right on one level, anyone can use these tools. But the solution is what? To ban them all? Regulate them into ineffectiveness? Ultimately you can’t have the opportunity of self-organizing enlightenment without the possibility of self-organizing hatred. But maybe then, we don’t want kids wandering making friends and helping homeless people. Yes, now that I reflect on it, being a passive hollywood and park avenue fed consumer was always so much better for society, democracy and freedom. Thank you for saving me from myself Andrew Keen!
I think Mr. Keen misses a key distinction when he compares the internet to movies, radio, and newspapers. The Internet is not a one-way-push medium or channel. Mr. Keen assumes there would be no counter-balancing representations, which doesn't seem likely to me. Consider the recent US election: When everyone and anyone can weigh in on a topic, the spoils go to whomever tells the best story, makes the most credible argument to the most people. Keen might argue that mastery of the new medium is a sine qua non, but I'd say Fox News stands the test of mastery. At the end of the day, people respond to IDEASE far more than to the medium through which they are delivered.
people are dumb .. read #mumbai .. improved mediums spread what there is to spread, and add a velocity to hysteria .. no medium improves the wisdom level of the content ..figure out how to do that, because it is needed
people are dumb .. read #mumbai .. improved mediums spread what there is to spread, and add a velocity to hysteria .. no medium improves the wisdom level of the content ..figure out how to do that, because it is needed