The Prime Minister, the Taliban and Human Rights

Harper’s comment’s regarding the Liberal’s ‘passion’ for the Taliban was more than just a new low point in Canadian political debate, it reveals the government’s disturbingly shallow grasp of the strategy and tactics necessary to win in Afghanistan.

For the sake of both our military and the mission, the Prime Minister would be wise to read Lieutenant David Grossman’s landmark book, On Killing. In the book, Grossman, an Army Lieutenant Colonel and professor at West Point, describes the psychological implications of killing, both legally and illegally, in battle. Of specific interest to the Prime Minister would be the author’s argument and the historical evidence that explain why adhering to the Geneva Conventions and treating POW’s humanely is of supreme strategic and tactical importance to any organized army.

In short, enemy forces are much more willing to surrender when secure in the knowledge that in doing so they will be treated fairly and humanely. Enemies that believe otherwise are likely to fight to the death and inflict greater causalities even in a losing effort.

During the Second World War the Western allies’ adherence to the Geneva Convention resulted in German soldiers surrendering to US forces in large numbers. This was in sharp contrast to the experience of the Soviets, who cared little for POW’s. But one need not go back 60 years for evidence. Lieutenant Paul Rieckhoff, who fought in Iraq and then founded and became Executive Director of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, makes a similar argument regarding today’s conflicts. Prior to the Abu Ghraib debacle he noted how: “on the streets of Baghdad, I saw countless insurgents surrender when faced with the prospect of a hot meal, a pack of cigarettes and air-conditioning. America’s moral integrity was the single most important weapon my platoon had on the streets. It saved innumerable lives…”

When members of parliament, and ordinary Canadians, ask about the treatment of Afghan prisoners they don’t do so out of contempt, but out of a deep respect and concern for, Canadian soldiers. Canadians know we can ill afford to treat enemy combatants inhumanely. They know this because it is in opposition to our values and our very purpose in Afghanistan. However, they also know there is a compelling military reason: it would rob our soldiers of possibly their single most important tactical and strategic tool – moral integrity. Without this tool, who knows many Canadian lives will be needlessly lost in battles where an insurgent, believing that surrender is tantamount to execution, will instead opt to fight to the death.

The Prime Minister may believe that talking like a cowboy about Afghan prisoners and human rights will make the Government appear tough. The unfortunately reality is that it only makes him a danger to both the mission, and our soldier’s lives.

5 thoughts on “The Prime Minister, the Taliban and Human Rights

  1. Nobody in particular

    Good post. I agree. I’m very angry that O’Connor and Hillier might have cooked up a “catch and release” detainee system over there, for what reason I do not know but there is certainly money involved. O’Connor said so on TV to Jane Taber. He said it was a “revolving door” and common that detainees handed over by Canadians get bailed out by their tribes. Harper knows. Harper tipped his hand coming to O’Connor’s defense the other day. What’s that about?
    Turns out now the G&M is talking about not only O’Connor misleading the House, but Kenney too! Looks like they have some proof. Might even have some info Verner should have had as well, time will tell, and Hansard.
    Harper’s left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, apparently.

    Reply
  2. Nobody in particular

    Good post. I agree. I’m very angry that O’Connor and Hillier might have cooked up a “catch and release” detainee system over there, for what reason I do not know but there is certainly money involved. O’Connor said so on TV to Jane Taber. He said it was a “revolving door” and common that detainees handed over by Canadians get bailed out by their tribes. Harper knows. Harper tipped his hand coming to O’Connor’s defense the other day. What’s that about?Turns out now the G&M is talking about not only O’Connor misleading the House, but Kenney too! Looks like they have some proof. Might even have some info Verner should have had as well, time will tell, and Hansard.Harper’s left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, apparently.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Toronto Star op-ed on Prime minister and the afghan prisoners

  4. dgbloome

    Torture complicity in Afganistan, massive police-state security in Vancouver, police in-custody violence, police cover-ups, government bureaucrats hiding their imcompetence behind Freedom of Information Act, the (family) laws and process which remove human rights of separated and divorced fathers? Canada is on a slippery slope by failing to ensure that all our laws and processes are diligent to human rights, compliant with our own Charter.

    Reply
  5. dgbloome

    Torture complicity in Afganistan, massive police-state security in Vancouver, police in-custody violence, police cover-ups, government bureaucrats hiding their imcompetence behind Freedom of Information Act, the (family) laws and process which remove human rights of separated and divorced fathers? Canada is on a slippery slope by failing to ensure that all our laws and processes are diligent to human rights, compliant with our own Charter.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s