Creating a City of Vancouver that thinks like the web

Last November my friend Mark Surman – Executive Director of the Mozilla Foundation – gave this wonderful speech entitled “A City that Thinks Like the Web” as a lunchtime keynote for 300 councillors, tech staff and agency heads at the City of Toronto’s internal Web 2.0 Summit.

During the talk the Mayor of Toronto took notes and blackberried his staff to find out what had been done and what was still possible and committed the City of Toronto to follow Mark’s call to:

  1. Open our data. transit. library catalogs. community centre schedules. maps. 311. expose it all so the people of Toronto can use it to make a better city. do it now.
  2. Crowdsource info gathering that helps the city.  somebody would have FixMyStreet.to up and running in a week if the Mayor promised to listen. encourage it.
  3. Ask for help creating a city that thinks like the web. copy Washington, DC’s contest strategy. launch it at BarCamp.

The fact is every major city can and should think like the web. The first step is to get local governments to share (our) data. We, collectively as a community, own this data and could do amazing things with it, if we were allowed. Think of how Google Maps is now able to use Translink data to show us where bus stops are, what buses stop there and when the next two are coming!

Google Map Transit YVR

Imagine if anyone could create such a map, mashing up a myriad of data from local governments, provincial ministries, StatsCan? Imagine the services that could be created, the efficiencies gained, the research that would be possible. The long tail of public policy analysis could flourish with citizen coders, bloggers, non-profits and companies creating ideas, services, and solutions the government has neither the means nor the time to address.

If the data is the basic food source of such an online ecosystem then having it categorized, structured and known is essential. The second step is making it available as APIs. Interestingly the City of Vancouver appears to have taken that first step. VanMaps is a fascinating project undertaken by the City of Vancouver and I encourage people to check it out. It is VERY exciting that the city has done this work and more importantly, made it visible to the public. This is forward thinking stuff. The upside is that, in order to create VanMaps all the data has been organized. The downside is that – as far as I can tell – the public is restricted to looking at, but not accessing, the data. That means integrating these data sets with Google maps, or mashing it up with other data sets is not possible (please correct me if I’ve got it wrong).

Indeed, in VanMaps Terms of Use suggests that even if the data were accessible, you aren’t allowed to use it.

VanMaps EULA

Item 4 is worth noting. VanMap may only be used for internal business or personal purposes. My interpretation of this is that any Mashups using VanMap data is verboten.

But let’s not focus on that for the moment. The key point is that creating a Vancouver that thinks like the web is possible. Above all, it increasingly looks like the IT infrastructure to make it happen may already be in place.

7 thoughts on “Creating a City of Vancouver that thinks like the web

  1. Pingback: Towards Building Toronto 2.0 « False Positives

  2. @lisatorjman

    great article, dae! this is along the lines of what ^changecamp part deux seeks to accomplish by opening govt data. interesting time to be tracking outcomes as this happens…

  3. Benjamin Johnson

    I really like this phrase. What would you anticipate as the core barriers we face that keep us from 'thinking like the web'? I would say communication shortfalls (technology's capabilities are not being maximized) are one, but fear is another. How do non-profits, gov, and people get over the fear of 'exposing themselves' to the crowd? If those questions can be answered/mitigated, then we can fast track initiatives like the translink google maps project.

  4. Mark Kuznicki

    Great post David. I think it's clear that open data (together with social media) are potentially transformative in how we might co-create our cities in new ways. The important point here is that we've had a good bit of success in Toronto in getting buy-in at the highest political levels, but there's nothing that prevents other cities from also breaking down the walls around our data.

  5. Drew Larson

    Projects like this drive me nuts. Why ActiveX? Why Java? This is a very poor attempt at a web2.0 app that isn't even remotely close to the mark. Instead of relying on open and proven solutions, Vancouver has decided to implement a ghoulish facsimile of a concept it clearly does not understand.

  6. Drew Larson

    Projects like this drive me nuts. Why ActiveX? Why Java? This is a very poor attempt at a web2.0 app that isn't even remotely close to the mark. Instead of relying on open and proven solutions, Vancouver has decided to implement a ghoulish facsimile of a concept it clearly does not understand.

  7. Pingback: » The Last Mile for Open Data

Comments are closed.