Yesterday, at the Right To Know Week panel discussion – Conference for Parliamentarians: Transparency in the Digital Era – organized by the Office of the Information Commissioner I shared three laws for Open Government Data that I’d devised on the flight from Vancouver.
The Three Laws of Open Government Data:
- If it can’t be spidered or indexed, it doesn’t exist
- If it isn’t available in open and machine readable format, it can’t engage
- If a legal framework doesn’t allow it to be repurposed, it doesn’t empower
To explain, (1) basically means: Can I find it? If Google (and/or other search engines) can’t find it, it essentially doesn’t exist for most citizens. So you’d better ensure that you are optimized to be crawled by all sorts of search engine spiders.
After I’ve found it, (2) notes that, to be useful, I need to be able to play with the data. Consequently, I need to be able to pull or download it in a useful format (e.g. an API, subscription feed, or a documented file). Citizens need data in a form that lets them mash it up with Google Maps or other data sets, or analyze in Excel. This is essentially the difference between VanMaps (look, but don’t play) and the Vancouver Data Portal, (look, take and play!). Citizens who can’t play with information are citizens who are disengaged/marginalized from the discussion.
Finally, even if I can find it and play with it, (3) highlights that I need a legal framework that allows me to share what I’ve created, to mobilize other citizens, provide a new service or just point out an interesting fact. This is the difference between Canada’s House of Parliament’s information (which, due to crown copyright, you can take, play with, but don’t you dare share or re-publish) and say, Whitehouse.gov which “pursuant to federal law, government-produced materials appearing on this site are not copyright protected.”
Find, Play and Share. That’s want we want.
Of course, a brief scan of the internet has revealed that others have also been thinking about this as well. There is this excellent 8 Principle of Open Government Data that are more detailed, and admittedly better, especially for a CIO level and lower conversation. But for talking to politicians (or Deputy Ministers or CEOs), like those in attendance during yesterday’s panel or, later that afternoon, the Speaker of the House, I found the simplicity of three resonated more strongly; it is a simpler list they can remember and demand.




Pingback: Open Data presentation at DemoCamp : djkelly.ca
Pingback: uberVU - social comments
Pingback: telefreizeit
Pingback: The Power of Open Data — Case Study: How Open Data Saved Canada $3.2 Billion « Legal Research Plus
Pingback: Thursday, May 20, 2010 « The Jeff Farias Show
Pingback: Confluence: Government Information Licensing Framework (GILF)
Pingback: Open Data in Italia: dati utili e dati aperti bastano per una reale trasparenza? « YBlog
Pingback: Does your Government (and thus you) actually own its data? | eaves.ca
Pingback: As 3 leis do dado aberto governamental | Transparência Hack Day Pará
Pingback: Mário Aragão – Desopilando » Dados abertos (open data)
Pingback: Alberta’s Expert Monitoring Panel | Matthew Dance
Pingback: Abian da GipuzkoaMatic, Foru Aldundiaren zerbitzu eta tresna digitalen bilgunea – zuzeu.com
Pingback: When information is power, these are the questions we should be asking | Online Journalism Blog
Pingback: Dados governamentais abertos, e ai Zé? « Felipe Bergamo
Pingback: O CIBERATIVISTA 13 « O CIBERATIVISTA
Pingback: 3 Steps to Consider When Pushing For Open Data in Government
Pingback: Announcing the OpenCorporates Advisory Board… governance with teeth | OpenCorporates news
Pingback: Open Data for Development in Latin America and the Caribbean » What is it?
Pingback: Dez anos » Why OData Matters (IMHO)
Pingback: Open Government, the Values and the Challenges (edit version) | Perempuan0n220185's Blog